2709 Shares

How convinced are you of global warming?

How convinced are you of global warming? Topic: The sun also rises thesis ideas
June 16, 2019 / By Clara
Question: Why would info be presented and represented by a politician and not a group of scientists? I'm not convinced Al Gore is one of reliable source of information here, despite his efforts. I'd like to be convinced of global warming and its threat .... so, please give me any info - preferably concise - that would convince me. There are areas where storms come up most often: - florida, thailand, (japan?), and there are areas where storms are becoming more destructive. But these storms are often fairly predictable, and I think mass transportation of affected residents to safer nearby areas might not be out of the question. Is this too crazy of an idea? I guess there would be a problem of cultures and societies clashing. Or maybe this idea would be completely out of the question anyway. What can be done about rising sea levels? Can walls be built on coastlines? Would it be realistic here to just move everybody to areas higher above sea level? I'm probably simplifying issues
Best Answer

Best Answers: How convinced are you of global warming?

Barb Barb | 4 days ago
Global warmin begins with the ozone layer and the pollution that is spewed into the air every day by cars and warehouses and anything else unatural. The thinner the layer and the more holes that form in it will allow more sun to pass thru and when the temperature rises the ice caps at the poles[north n south] will begin to melt. Thats what is gonna cause the sea levels to rise, the increase in water, and i guess the only way to prevent any of this is to stop pollution. Another contribution is the greenhouse gases. theses gases trap energy from the sun that would normally be released into space n since its not bein released its also warming up the earth. Dont kno how to fix that one.
👍 216 | 👎 4
Did you like the answer? How convinced are you of global warming? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: The sun also rises thesis ideas


Barb Originally Answered: How convinced are you of global warming?
Global warmin begins with the ozone layer and the pollution that is spewed into the air every day by cars and warehouses and anything else unatural. The thinner the layer and the more holes that form in it will allow more sun to pass thru and when the temperature rises the ice caps at the poles[north n south] will begin to melt. Thats what is gonna cause the sea levels to rise, the increase in water, and i guess the only way to prevent any of this is to stop pollution. Another contribution is the greenhouse gases. theses gases trap energy from the sun that would normally be released into space n since its not bein released its also warming up the earth. Dont kno how to fix that one.

Addy Addy
My beliefs and theories told me that the whole global warming thing will instead trigger another ice age that will gradually compensate for the over heating... Thus increasing the vaporization rate in the ocean, as thermal exchanges will increase, thus resulting in more, and stronger typhoons, and even more volcanic eruption in the last phase of the cycle. You see, most think that it will not happen like this, because the historical models are not showing it could be possible, for the reason, that the thermoaline belt in the atlantic was connected to the Pacific ocean by the middle of the American continent (the south was only connected to the north about 100000y-a) after the connection done, the panama peninsula (at the time) did erase such connection with the pacific, thus resulting in a the establishment of a new thermal exchange system that triggered a massive climate change. The time it has taken to reconnect the new thermoaline belt with the pacific concord with the last ice age period... Now this panama canal is still too small to connect thermal exchange currents, but the climatic warming will disrupt once again the thermoline belt, thus creating a new ice age...
👍 90 | 👎 2

Tanner Tanner
Q: Why would info be presented and represented by a politician and not a group of scientists? A: It is presented by scientists. But no one cares about science . . . honestly, how many journals of meteorology have you cracked open in the last month? Global warming isn't a conjecture, it's observed. Glaciers are melting, average temperatures are up. The conjecture comes in when you ask yourself, "Will next year be warmer than this one?" Or, "Did humans cause this?" Which you can argue all you want. As per your request, I pulled this abstract from a journal, which is how information is presented and represented by scientists: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society Article: pp. 1007–1023 | Abstract | PDF (1.52M) A New Perspective on Recent Global Warming: Asymmetric Trends of Daily Maximum and Minimum Temperature Thomas R. Karla, Philip D. Jonesb, Richard W. Knighta, George Kuklac, Neil Plummerd, Vyacheslav Razuvayeve, Kevin P. Galloa, Janette Lindseayf, Robert J. Charlsong, and Thomas C. Petersona ABSTRACT Monthly mean maximum and minimum temperatures for over 50% (10%) of the Northern (Southern) Hemisphere landmass, accounting for 37% of the global landmass, indicate that the rise of the minimum temperature has occurred at a rate three times that of the maximum temperature during the period 1951–90 (0.84°C versus 0.28°C). The decrease of the diurnal temperature range is approximately equal to the increase of mean temperature. The asymmetry is detectable in all seasons and in most of the regions studied.
👍 87 | 👎 0

Peregrine Peregrine
The reason it is presented by a politician is because no one could scientifically make any of the wild doomsday scenarios as a probability. Most scientists in the field predict a minor change that will "LIKELY" raise temperatures by a couple of degrees. The models are very complex and it is not known what the effects of natural buffer systems like clouds will be. It takes a politician to translate that into the greatest danger that man ever faced and likely to destroy the Earth. You may want to believe it to get along but your skepticism of a politician saying this is well justified. Ozone depletion has virtually nothing to do with global warming.
👍 84 | 👎 -2

Lucas Lucas
Al Gore, according to many leading scientists, didn't use facts which were explicit to his theories. Instead of combatting climate change, Al Gore has been given the world stage including public attention, a movie, an Oscar and a hit at the White House. It was only a generation ago that scientists were concerned about GLOBAL COOLING! The only thing Al Gore has to say is ... very (b)goring.
👍 81 | 👎 -4

Lucas Originally Answered: Research for global warming?
They do "research", but they don't seem to understand the difference between real science and personal opinions. So they read op-ed pieces (normally by non-scientists) rather than peer reviewed scientific journals. Or they read personal blogs rather than web-sites by actual science organizations (e.g. NASA, NOAA, or any major Universities involved in climate research). The problem, is that people with little or no science training, assume they can spend an hour or two on google and then make an informed decision about a very complex scientific topic. And in 99% of the cases, they're already convinced it's not true (probably because they listen to Rush Limbaugh or watch Fox news) before they do any "research". So the only purpose of their "research" is to find anything that seems to support their prejudiced view that global warming can't be true.

If you have your own answer to the question the sun also rises thesis ideas, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.